Features
Every part of Mirorly, in the open.
The three things it does — help you say something difficult, help you look at yourself honestly, and help you hear it from other people — listed one by one, with what is finished, what is still being built, and what we have decided never to build. Including the real screens, not mock-ups of them.
29 things work right now. 7 more are under way and marked as such below — we would rather tell you than let you find out. What ships, and when, is public in the changelog.
Saying it · the real screen
You pick the situation.
It gives you the sentence.
45 situations, fifteen in each direction — down, up and sideways. Each one comes worded three ways, and the difference between them is the angle, not the strength: one opens with a question, one with a statement, one with a record. Nothing is softened, because softening is one of the things the rules flag.
The names, dates and numbers stay yours. The product never invents them, because it does not know them.
Prepare a conversation
The third missed deadline in a row
The last three deadlines on the migration work moved, and each time I heard about it on the day. What that costs me is … — I need to know earlier than the morning it is due.
- No praise wrapped round the point — the sandwich is the most common way this backfires.
- Describes what happened, not what kind of person they are.
- “Always” reads as a verdict about them. One example they can argue with lands better than a pattern they can deny.
Name the three dates, and stop talking.
Take it, then land on what changes.
Let it sit. Then ask what they need from you.
Your conversations
- The third missed deadline in a rowDid anything change?14d
- Priorities changing mid-weekAgreed: no new scope after Wed6d
- A peer taking shared creditPrepared — not had yet1d
Afterwards · the real screen
It asks you, two weeks later, whether anything changed.
A conversation goes through three states: prepared, then what you agreed and by when, then the check-in that arrives on its own a fortnight afterwards. One of the four answers it accepts is “I never had it”, because that is what usually happens and a register that cannot record it is a register that lies to you.
This is the half that needs an account, and an account only comes with a subscription.
Hearing it back · the real screen
Where your view and theirs come apart.
When you want it from other people rather than about them, you answer the questions about yourself first, then send the same set out. What comes back is ranked by distance from your own answer — because the number that mattered was never the average, it was the gap.
No paragraph is generated to tell you what it means. Averaging the disagreement away would destroy the only thing worth reading.
Insights
Where your view and theirs diverge
Ranked by the gap between how you rated yourself and how peers rated you. Bigger gap = bigger blind spot or hidden strength.
#1 Biggest gap
Major gapWhen I hand work over, I genuinely let go of it.
- You
- 5 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 2.2 / 5
You rate yourself 2.8 higher than peers.
#2 Biggest gap
Moderate gapI stay steady when things go wrong.
- You
- 3 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 4.2 / 5
Peers rate you 1.2 higher than yourself.
#3 Biggest gap
Moderate gapI make it clear what matters most right now.
- You
- 4 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 3.0 / 5
You rate yourself 1.0 higher than peers.
Most aligned
AlignedI follow through on what I commit to.
- You
- 4 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 4.0 / 5
You and your peers see this the same.
Sample round — illustrative data, not a real customer's results.
The other side of it
What the people you ask actually get.
Two things have to be true at once for anyone to answer you honestly: they must be certain you cannot trace an answer back to them, and you must still be able to chase the people who have not replied. Both screens below exist so that neither one has to give way.
Their side — no account, about four minutes
Alex asked you to answer a short Core leadership behaviours round.
Your answers are anonymous. They're pooled with everyone else's — Alex sees group averages, never who said what. Takes about four minutes. No account needed.
Delegation
When Alex hands work over, they genuinely let go of it.
Can you give an example? (optional)
Your side — who has answered, never what they said
3 of 5 have answered
Answers appear once a group has 2+
- MMayaDirect reportResponded
- TTomasPeerResponded
- PPriyaManagerResponded
- JJonasPeerSent
- SSamDirect reportSent
You can see who hasn't answered yet and nudge them. You can never see which answer came from whom.
21 templates, all readable before you pay
Each one is a question set built for a specific moment, with the research it's grounded in cited. You don't have to take our word for the quality — every question in every template is already published.
The two views above are faithful depictions, not live components — the real ones are wired to your data. The results screen above is the real thing.
The full list
Everything, marked honestly.
Live means you can use it today. In build means it is designed and under way but not there yet — listed because you deserve to know what you are buying and what you are waiting for. Rows marked no account needed are open right now, without signing up for anything.
Saying it to someone
The conversation you keep rehearsing.
- The situation catalogueNo account needed
- 45 situations, 15 each for talking down, up and sideways. Every one worded three ways, and three likely reactions prepared before you walk in.
- A note about the whole personNo account needed
- For a year-end summary or a “write me something about them” request: five structural checks on what you chose and in what order, and a hard limit of five topics, because a review nobody finishes changes nothing.
- The blank pageNo account needed
- For the situation the catalogue does not have. It picks the frame and the direction, and checks the wording as you type.
- The rules checkNo account needed
- Every rule came from a real pair of sentences — this lands, this backfires — not from a model. Advisory, never blocking: it shows you where the sentence breaks and leaves the decision with you.
- Feedback request writerNo account needed
- Word a request that gets an answer instead of a compliment: the moment, your own read of it, the question. It also tells you when the person you have in mind cannot answer you honestly whatever you write.
- The conversation register
- Prepared, then what you agreed and by when. Kept, so that in a month you know more than “it went fine”.
- The two-week check-in
- It comes back on its own and asks whether anything changed. One of the four answers is “I never had it”.
- Patterns across conversations
- Which conversations keep coming back, with whom, and about what — visible after a few months of register.
Looking at yourself
Nobody else involved, and nobody else told.
- Self-assessmentNo account needed
- Question sets about how you actually manage. Answer one, read your answers back, copy or print them, and run the same set again months later.
- The same questions, logged in or not
- One library, whether or not you have an account. With a subscription your answers are kept, so the next run is a comparison rather than a fresh start.
Hearing it from other people
A full 360 round, in every plan.
- Template library
- 21 research-backed question sets, each built for a specific moment — after a project, quarterly, a new role, upward feedback.
- Every question visible upfront
- Read all the questions in any template, plus the research behind them, before you pay for anything.
- Behavioural question design
- Questions ask about observable behaviour in a specific moment, not personality traits — so answers are specific enough to act on.
- Template versions
- Templates can be revised without breaking your history; your old rounds keep the version you actually ran.
- Your own answers first
- You answer the questions about yourself before anyone else sees them. That answer becomes the baseline everything else is measured against.
- You and your team in one round
- Run a round on yourself, send the same questions out, and read both halves side by side. The default, and the highest-value mode.
- Email invitations
- Send the round from Mirorly — each person gets their own link. No copy-pasting, no spreadsheet.
- Respondent tracking
- See who's been invited, who has answered, and who hasn't — never what any individual said.
- Anonymity with a floor
- Peer answers are aggregated, and a group only appears once it has at least two responses, so no single answer is identifiable.
- Round lifecycle
- Close a round when you've heard enough, reopen it if more should come in, or delete it for good.
- Invite a group at once
- Select several saved people in one go instead of adding them one by one.
- Gap cards
- Your biggest divergences first — where your self-rating and their answers pull apart the most, ranked.
- Heatmap
- Every comparable question sorted by gap size, with the peer distribution and spread, so you can tell disagreement from consensus.
- By relationship
- Managers, peers and direct reports in their own columns — because the interesting thing is usually which group sees you differently.
- Statistical synthesis, not AI narrative
- Distributions, gaps and per-group breakdowns. No generated paragraph telling you what to think — flattening the disagreement would destroy the signal.
- Trajectory over time
- One line per dimension across all your rounds — whether the gaps you're working on are actually closing.
- Side-by-side rounds
- Compare any two rounds directly, question by question.
- One-page summary
- A round condensed to a single page you can sit with — or keep.
- Action plan
- Turn a gap into one concrete commitment with a date. Build it straight from a result, or add something you're working on yourself.
- Wins list
- A running list of the strengths your feedback keeps surfacing — the things worth protecting as deliberately as the things you're fixing.
- Recurring rounds
- Mark a round as repeating — monthly through yearly — and Mirorly emails you when it's time to run the next one.
- People
- Save the people you ask, with how they know you, and reuse them across rounds instead of retyping.
- Calendar view
- Every round and reminder on one timeline.
Your account
What it is, and how you leave.
- Passwordless sign-in
- A magic link to your inbox. No password to invent, forget, or leak.
- Your name and face on the ask
- Respondents see who's asking, which makes the request land as a person rather than a form.
- Cancel and refund yourself
- Cancel from Billing without emailing anyone, at any time. Access runs to the end of the period you have paid for, and inside the first 14 days the same screen issues the refund.
Deliberately absent
What we're not building.
Not a roadmap gap — a decision. Each of these would make Mirorly worse at the one job it exists to do.
- AI-written summaries of your feedback — averaging away the disagreement destroys the one thing worth reading.
- Integrations with Slack, Teams, Calendar or Zapier.
- Team and company plans, admin seats, or rolling this out across a department.
- Performance ratings, scoring, or anything designed for an HR review cycle.
- Export to PDF or CSV.
- Tracking individual respondents over time — results are always aggregated.
That's the whole tool.
No trial, because there is no need for one: everything above is either working or marked as not. If it turns out not to be for you, the first fourteen days are refundable from the same screen you cancel on.