Features
Every part of Mirorly, in the open.
What's live today, what's being built next, and what we deliberately won't build. Including the actual results screen, not a mockup of it.
20 things work right now. 6 more are in progress and marked as such below — we'd rather tell you than let you find out. What ships, when, is public in the changelog.
The results screen
Where the whole thing pays off.
This is the real view, rendered from the same code the app runs. Your answer sits next to each group's, question by question, because the number that matters was never the average — it's the distance between the columns.
Insights
Where your view and theirs diverge
Ranked by the gap between how you rated yourself and how peers rated you. Bigger gap = bigger blind spot or hidden strength.
#1 Biggest gap
Major gapWhen I hand work over, I genuinely let go of it.
- You
- 5 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 2.2 / 5
You rate yourself 2.8 higher than peers.
#2 Biggest gap
Moderate gapI stay steady when things go wrong.
- You
- 3 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 4.2 / 5
Peers rate you 1.2 higher than yourself.
#3 Biggest gap
Moderate gapI make it clear what matters most right now.
- You
- 4 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 3.0 / 5
You rate yourself 1.0 higher than peers.
Most aligned
AlignedI follow through on what I commit to.
- You
- 4 / 5
- Peers (n=6)
- 4.0 / 5
You and your peers see this the same.
By relationship
How each group sees it
Average score per group, question by question (1–5). The gaps between columns are the signal — where your managers, peers, and reports experience you differently. A group needs 2+ responses to show, so no single person is identifiable.
| Question | You | Managers | Peers | Direct reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.When I hand work over, I genuinely let go of it. | 5.0n=1 | 3.5n=2 | 2.5n=2 | 1.5n=2 |
| 2.I make it clear what matters most right now. | 4.0n=1 | 4.0n=2 | 3.5n=2 | 2.0n=2 |
| 3.People can disagree with me without it costing them. | 4.0n=1 | 4.5n=2 | 3.5n=2 | 2.5n=2 |
| 4.I stay steady when things go wrong. | 3.0n=1 | 4.0n=2 | 4.5n=2 | 4.0n=2 |
Heatmap
All comparable questions, ranked
Sorted by gap magnitude — biggest first. The number beneath each badge shows the exact gap (signed for ratings: peer average minus your score; agreement % for picks). Open-text questions don't have a quantitative gap and stay in the detailed view below.
| Question | You | Peers | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
1.When I hand work over, I genuinely let go of it. You 5 / 5 · Peers 2.2 / 5 (n=6) | 5 / 5 | 2.2 / 5n=6 · σ 0.7 | Major gap−2.8 |
4.I stay steady when things go wrong. You 3 / 5 · Peers 4.2 / 5 (n=6) | 3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5n=6 · σ 0.7 | Moderate gap+1.2 |
2.I make it clear what matters most right now. You 4 / 5 · Peers 3.0 / 5 (n=6) | 4 / 5 | 3.0 / 5n=6 · σ 0.8 | Moderate gap−1.0 |
3.People can disagree with me without it costing them. You 4 / 5 · Peers 3.3 / 5 (n=6) | 4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5n=6 · σ 0.7 | Minor gap−0.7 |
5.I follow through on what I commit to. You 4 / 5 · Peers 4.0 / 5 (n=6) | 4 / 5 | 4.0 / 5n=6 · σ 0.6 | Aligned0.0 |
Sample round — illustrative data, not a real customer's results.
Before that
The questions, and what your team actually gets.
What the people you ask see
Their own link, your name on it, no account to create. They answer once in about four minutes, and their answers are pooled — so the honest version is safe to give.
Alex asked you to answer a short Core leadership behaviours round.
Your answers are anonymous. They're pooled with everyone else's — Alex sees group averages, never who said what. Takes about four minutes. No account needed.
Delegation
When Alex hands work over, they genuinely let go of it.
Can you give an example? (optional)
Who's answered, and who hasn't
You can chase the people who haven't responded without ever learning which answer belonged to whom. Both facts have to be true for this to work.
3 of 5 have answered
Answers appear once a group has 2+
- MMayaDirect reportResponded
- TTomasPeerResponded
- PPriyaManagerResponded
- JJonasPeerSent
- SSamDirect reportSent
You can see who hasn't answered yet and nudge them. You can never see which answer came from whom.
21 templates, all readable before you pay
Each one is a question set built for a specific moment, with the research it's grounded in cited. You don't have to take our word for the quality — every question in every template is already published.
The two views above are faithful depictions, not live components — the real ones are wired to your data. The results screen further up is the real thing.
The full list
Everything, marked honestly.
Live means you can use it today. Buildingmeans it's designed and in progress but not there yet — listed because you deserve to know what you're buying and what you're waiting for.
Questions
- LiveTemplate library
21 research-backed question sets, each built for a specific moment — after a project, quarterly, a new role, upward feedback.
- LiveEvery question visible upfront
Read all the questions in any template, plus the research behind them, before you pay for anything.
- LiveBehavioural question design
Questions ask about observable behaviour in a specific moment, not personality traits — so answers are specific enough to act on.
- LiveTemplate versions
Templates can be revised without breaking your history; your old rounds keep the version you actually ran.
Running a round
- LiveSelf-assessment first
You answer the questions about yourself before anyone else sees them. That answer becomes the baseline everything else is measured against.
- LiveYou + your team in one round
Run a round on yourself, send the same questions out, and read both halves side by side. The default, and the highest-value mode.
- LiveEmail invitations
Send the round from Mirorly — each person gets their own link. No copy-pasting, no spreadsheet.
- LiveRespondent tracking
See who's been invited, who has answered, and who hasn't — never what any individual said.
- LiveAnonymity with a floor
Peer answers are aggregated, and a group only appears once it has at least two responses, so no single answer is identifiable.
- LiveRound lifecycle
Close a round when you've heard enough, reopen it if more should come in, or delete it for good.
- BuildingInvite a group at once
Select several saved people in one go instead of adding them one by one.
What comes back
- LiveGap cards
Your biggest divergences first — where your self-rating and their answers pull apart the most, ranked.
- LiveHeatmap
Every comparable question sorted by gap size, with the peer distribution and spread, so you can tell disagreement from consensus.
- LiveBy relationship
Managers, peers and direct reports in their own columns — because the interesting thing is usually which group sees you differently.
- LiveStatistical synthesis, not AI narrative
Distributions, gaps and per-group breakdowns. No generated paragraph telling you what to think — flattening the disagreement would destroy the signal.
- BuildingTrajectory over time
One line per dimension across all your rounds — whether the gaps you're working on are actually closing.
- BuildingSide-by-side rounds
Compare any two rounds directly, question by question.
- BuildingOne-page summary
A round condensed to a single page you can sit with — or keep.
Acting on it
- LiveAction plan
Turn a gap into one concrete commitment with a date. Build it straight from a result, or add something you're working on yourself.
- BuildingWins list
A running list of the strengths your feedback keeps surfacing — the things worth protecting as deliberately as the things you're fixing.
Cadence & people
- LiveRecurring rounds
Mark a round as repeating — monthly through yearly — and Mirorly emails you when it's time to run the next one.
- LivePeople
Save the people you ask, with how they know you, and reuse them across rounds instead of retyping.
- BuildingCalendar view
Every round and reminder on one timeline.
Account
- LivePasswordless sign-in
A magic link to your inbox. No password to invent, forget, or leak.
- LiveYour name and face on the ask
Respondents see who's asking, which makes the request land as a person rather than a form.
- LiveCancel and refund yourself
Cancel from Billing without emailing anyone. Inside the 30-day window, take the full refund on the spot — processed immediately.
What we're not building.
Not a roadmap gap — a decision. Each of these would make Mirorly worse at the one job it exists to do.
- AI-written summaries of your feedback — averaging away the disagreement destroys the one thing worth reading.
- Integrations with Slack, Teams, Calendar or Zapier.
- Team and company plans, admin seats, or rolling this out across a department.
- Performance ratings, scoring, or anything designed for an HR review cycle.
- Export to PDF or CSV.
- Tracking individual respondents over time — results are always aggregated.
That's the whole tool.
No trial, because there's no need for one: everything above is either working or marked as not. If it turns out not to be for you, cancel and take the full refund yourself within 30 days.