About

Mirorly is one person’s answer to the conversation nobody prepares for.

Most feedback at work is theatre — the form filled in on a Friday and forgotten by Monday, the summary that flattens a hundred answers into platitudes. None of it helps the person who has something difficult to say on Tuesday. That person is who this was built for.

What it is

Three directions, one account.

Mirorly runs in three directions, and every plan has all three from the first day — what changes is the order people find them in, not what they get.

Saying it to someone

You pick your situation. You do not design anything.

A catalogue of real situations, each worded three ways, with the three likely reactions prepared before you walk in. Then the register keeps what you agreed, and asks in a fortnight whether it changed.

45 situations · 15 down, 15 up, 15 sideways

Looking at yourself

Nobody else involved, and nobody else told.

A self-assessment you can answer alone and run again months later. The lowest social cost of anything here — you do not have to ask a soul.

The same questions, logged in or not

Hearing it from other people

Your own answers first, then theirs beside them.

A full round: research-backed question sets, your own answers as the baseline, and the gaps between the two ranked by size. Included in every plan rather than sold as the upgrade.

In every plan, from the first day

Who’s behind it

One person, and no committee.

Mirorly is the work of one person. No investors, no board to report to, no team. The trade-off is honest: things move at the pace one person can sustain. The benefit is that every decision about the product is made by somebody who uses it, rather than by a committee optimising for somebody’s deck.

The motivation is not original. I got tired of the way feedback works at most companies, and wanted a tool that treated the person using it as an adult. The execution is me, sitting down and making it, week by week, in the gaps between everything else.

What I believe

Six things I am not flexible on.

There is no AI in the product, and that is a feature.
No model writes your sentence, summarises your round, or drafts your plan. A generated paragraph averages away the disagreement, which is the one thing worth reading — and your colleagues’ answers are not training data.
Feedback should be specific, or it should not be asked for.
“Any feedback?” produces “you’re doing great.” Specific questions get specific answers, and a specific sentence is the whole job.
The checker advises. It never blocks.
The rules come from real pairs of sentences — this lands, this backfires — not from a model, so they are the same every time and you can argue with them. They show you where a sentence breaks and leave the decision with you.
Names, dates and numbers are yours.
The product supplies the shape of the sentence and stops there. It does not invent the specifics of your situation, because only you know them. That is a boundary, not a gap.
The tool should not be harder than the work it helps with.
If it needs onboarding, it is wrong. You can use all three tools without an account, without a card, and for as long as you like — a subscription buys the memory, not the tool.
You are an adult.
No badges. No streaks. No “you’re crushing it!” People who pay to get better at their work do not need to be entertained while doing it.

The longer version of why the product exists at all is on the vision page.

Who it’s for

Built for one person at a time, and honest about who that is not.

For

Anyone with something difficult to say to somebody at work — to the person they manage, to a peer, or upwards.
Managers who were handed the job without being taught this part of it.
Founders, experts and HR-of-one — the people who are the whole function and have nobody to hand it to.
Anyone who wants to know how they land before somebody tells them at review time.

Not for

Enterprise review cycles: ratings, calibration, and rolling a process out across a department.
Anyone hoping a model will read their team and report back.
Anyone looking for badges, streaks or social features.
Teams wanting shared seats and admin controls. This is one account, one person.

None of those are bad. They are just not this, and there are good tools for them elsewhere.

Is this safe?

A fair question to ask a one-person operation.

Three answers, and each one links to the document that governs it — so you can check rather than take my word for it.

Where your data lives

The database is hosted in a European Union region and the data stays in the EU. Hosting is Vercel, a US company that uses EU edge regions for performance; outgoing mail is processed in Ireland. Billing runs through LemonSqueezy as merchant of record, so tax and refunds are handled wherever you are. The full list of processors is in the privacy policy.

What is done with it

Page views are counted by a first-party counter that sets no cookie and stores no IP address. Google Analytics loads only if you allow it, and declining changes nothing about how the site works. No session recordings, no ad networks, nothing sold or shared beyond the processors needed to run the service. Round answers are anonymous at the database level — even I cannot link them to a person.

If Mirorly ever shuts down

At least 30 days’ notice, by email, from me. A one-time export of your data on request, a refund of the unused part of what you paid, and deletion within 30 days of the shutdown completing. Written down in the terms, not just promised here.

If that sounds right, the rest of the site is the proof.

And if it does not, that is also fine — better that you find a tool that fits than that I talk you into one that does not.

See the plans