Who it's for
Is thisfor you?
Mirorly is a 360 review you run on yourself, then with people you trust. It is not for everyone, and we'd rather you decide before you pay than after.
The feedback you're collecting is leadership feedback — on how you work, not on what you produce. Your decisions, your communication, your patterns, your blind spots. Not your output. Not your team. You.
Start here
You've been meaning to do this for a year now.
Sometime last spring you decided you'd ask for honest feedback. You drafted three questions. You picked two people. You opened a tab to a survey tool. Then a release shipped, the quarter closed, the kid got sick, the offsite happened. The tab is still open, in a different browser now, on a different laptop.
In the meantime you got the polite version. You ran a meeting that didn't feel right and asked one person afterwards if it landed weirdly. They said no, you're fine. You didn't entirely believe them. You moved on. That happened three or four times this year.
You felt the impulse to do something about it. Then a meeting started.
“95% of people believe they're self-aware. Only 10–15% actually are.”
You, statistically, are probably not in the 10–15%. If any of that is recognizable, keep reading. The rest of this page is for you.
It's for you if
You decided the development was on you.
Four versions of the same person. If you're any of them, the rest of the product is built around the round you'd already run if you had the time to design it.
First-time managers, in their first 18 months.
You got promoted because you were good at the work. Nobody handed you a manual. Your boss is too busy, HR is for someone else's company, and the only feedback you get on your management is that nobody has quit yet. You'd run a structured 360 round on yourself if a structured 360 round took less than a weekend to design.
Solo founders building the company and running the team.
There is no one above you to schedule your review. The board talks about strategy, not about you. Your co-founder gives you feedback that's calibrated for the friendship, not for the work. You suspect the version of yourself you're growing into has a few patterns you can't see from inside, and that the cost of not seeing them gets bigger every quarter.
Senior ICs who manage a small team on the side.
You're an engineer, designer, scientist, or operator who's now also responsible for three to six people. The IC work is the part you measure yourself on. The management work is the part nobody measures, including you. You'd like to know whether the thing you're spending 30% of your week on is actually working — for them, not just for you.
Experts running their own practice.
Consultants, lawyers, designers, coaches, fractional anything. Clients tell you what they want; they rarely tell you how you're showing up. The retainer renewals tell a story but not a precise one. You're senior enough that nobody volunteers honest feedback unless you specifically build the channel for it.
The connecting thread isn't a job title. It's the decision that nobody is going to schedule your growth for you, and that waiting for that to change is the slowest path to the version of yourself you're trying to become.
Won't my team think it's weird?
A personal practice, not a corporate ritual.
A leader using a feedback tool that the team doesn't have isn't actually new. It's the same status as seeing a therapist, working with an executive coach, or reading a leadership book — solo use, your own pocket, no one looking over your shoulder. None of those create friction when the leader uses them privately, because they're not zero-sum: a leader doing the work makes the experience better for everyone around them.
The asymmetry — you have the tool, your team doesn't — is the design choice, not the flaw. It's what keeps the feedback honest. A corporate 360 paid for by HR carries the implicit message the company is grading you, and respondents perform accordingly. $99 a year out of your own pocket carries the opposite message: I'm doing this for myself. That's the framing that earns real answers.
Where the asymmetry could go wrong is in how you ask. Fill in my feedback tool sounds performative. I'm trying to see myself more clearly — would you help me? doesn't. Mirorly provides a suggested intro message when you generate your share link, designed exactly to defuse the perception.
Not for you if
We'd rather lose the sale than mis-sell you.
The fastest way to get a refund in thirty days is to buy something built for someone else. Four versions of someone else.
You run reviews for 200 people on a five-point scale.
You need calibration meetings, an HR dashboard, and audit-trail documentation. Mirorly does none of those things. Lattice, Culture Amp, 15Five — built for you. Mirorly is built for one of those 200 people, running their own round.
You want AI to summarize what your team really meant.
Mirorly doesn't paraphrase your respondents. The synthesis is statistical (averages, deltas, side-by-side), not interpretive. The actual reading of the answers is yours. If you want a model to tell you what to think about it, this isn't the tool.
You want to push feedback on others.
Mirorly is for asking for feedback about yourself. It is not a tool for managers to evaluate their reports. The whole product is built around the manager being the subject, not the assessor.
You want it free, or you want a 14-day trial.
It's $99 a year, paid up front. Thirty-day full refund if it isn't useful. Nothing locked behind a higher tier — there is no higher tier. If $99 is the wrong order of magnitude for the problem, this also isn't the tool.
The choice you're actually making
Doing nothing has a price too.
The honest comparison isn't Mirorly versus another tool. It's Mirorly versus the version of you who keeps meaning to ask, and doesn't. That version has been running the experiment for a year already. The data is in. It looks like this: nothing changed, and you noticed.
Twelve months from now you'll be a year older. You'll either know something specific about how you show up to the people who work with you — and have started moving the patterns you didn't like — or you'll have the same instincts you have today, with one more year of evidence that the instincts on their own aren't shifting.
Ninety-nine dollars is the cost of the tool. The actual cost you've been paying is invisible — quiet, compounding, expensive, and not on any invoice. We don't need to convince you the price is good. We need you to notice the other one.
You meant to. You'll mean to next quarter, too.
Run your first round.
The fastest way to find out whether this is for you is to spend an hour using it. The refund is there for the other answer.
$99 a year. 30-day full refund — no questions asked.