40 honest answers about Mirorly.

You pick a template from the Library (calibrated for a specific context — quarterly check-in, post-project, before a 1:1, peer-only, upward, after promotion), answer the questions yourself, generate a link, and send it to anyone whose perspective you want. There's no cap on how many people respond; three to five tends to surface clear patterns without diluting the signal. They answer the same questions about you with no signup required. When responses come in, you see the comparison — what you said about yourself, what they said, where the gaps are. From there you can write an action plan or save patterns to a "what's working" list.

No. Respondents click a link, fill out the questions, submit. No account, no login, no friction — friction kills response rates. They can optionally provide their email if they want to identify themselves; that's their call.

Your call, when you create the round. You decide whether responses are anonymous (responses aren't linked to a specific person on your end) or named (the respondent identifies themselves). Respondents see clearly which mode the round is in before they start answering.

For you, on the self-assessment side: fifteen minutes is enough to start, 30–60 if you want to go deep — your call. The template stays open across sessions, so going deep doesn't have to happen in one sitting. For respondents: under 15 minutes. We optimize hard for keeping respondent time low — the longer it takes, the more shallow the answers get.

Yes. You can run as many rounds as you want, on whatever cadence makes sense per relationship — an annual anchor with your full peer circle, a quarterly deep-dive on one specific skill, post-project retros with collaborators, semi-annual check-in with your boss. Each round is its own template instance with its own respondents.

Mirorly is built for considered, not constant. A natural rhythm for most users is one annual anchor (the broad scan, full peer circle), one deep-dive per quarter (focused on a single skill, same peers or a narrower group), plus one-shots when career moments demand them. The same peers shouldn't see a feedback request from you more than 1-2 times a year — if you're sending weekly, you're using it wrong, and you'll erode the trust that makes responses honest. The templates are grouped in the library by when to use them, not just what they're about, so the cadence is visible at the point of choice.

Mirorly is a personal practice, not a corporate ritual — the same status as seeing a therapist, working with an executive coach, or reading a leadership book. None of those create friction when the leader uses them solo, because they're not zero-sum: a leader doing the work makes the experience better for everyone around them. The asymmetry (you have the tool, your team doesn't) is actually the feature, not the bug — it's what keeps the feedback honest. A corporate 360 paid for by HR carries the implicit message "the company is grading you," and respondents perform accordingly. Mirorly's $99/year out of your own pocket carries the opposite message: "I'm doing this for myself." That's the framing that earns real answers. Where the asymmetry could go wrong is in HOW you ask — "fill in my feedback tool" sounds performative; "I'm trying to see myself more clearly, would you help me?" doesn't. Mirorly provides a suggested intro message when you generate your share link, designed exactly for this.

Yes. The dashboard shows results round by round, side-by-side comparison between any two rounds, and deltas across cycles. The change-over-time view is the one most generic survey tools don't do — and it's where compounding self-knowledge actually shows up.

Mirorly is single-user — it runs your feedback loop, on yourself. There is no team-management view. If what you're trying to do is run a feedback program for ten direct reports, this is not the right tool. If what you're trying to do is run your own development loop and occasionally invite your team to weigh in, this is exactly the right tool.

English only, for now. The product UI, every template, and the marketing site are all in English. We've considered other languages — Polish, German, Spanish are the obvious next ones — but localizing well means re-calibrating each template against research in that language, not just translating. That's a year-two task, once the English version proves itself with the first wave of users.

We research peer-reviewed sources on motivation, leadership, communication, growth, and feedback — universities, research institutes, organizations publishing in HR, management, leadership, and 360-feedback. AI drafts question candidates from that research; humans review every question for quality, sourcing, and phrasing before publication. AI is not used at runtime — the templates are static, curated once.

No, at least not in the first version. Templates are closed packs. You pick the one that fits your context, but you don't modify it. The point of curation is calibration; opening it up to free editing dilutes the value of the template. Custom questions are a longer-term consideration, not a first-version feature.

Maybe, eventually. The first version keeps templates closed to protect calibration. But the question comes up often enough to answer it directly: self-authored templates, and possibly a community marketplace where users publish templates they've calibrated themselves (with quality review baked in), are on the long-term consideration list. Trigger: once we've seen which contexts users wish the curated library covered. Not promised, not dated — on the table.

Twenty at launch, calibrated for different contexts. The Library page has the full list and what each one is for, with citations to the research the questions are grounded in.

The contexts where 360 feedback is actually most useful — quarterly check-in, post-project retrospective, before or after a promotion, peer-only rounds, upward feedback, before a 1:1, the first six months in a new manager role, and several variants calibrated specifically for first-time managers. The Library page lists every template as it goes live.

Two reasons. First, AI summarization flattens specifics — and the specifics are usually the actual signal in feedback. "Your team thinks you're a great communicator" is what AI tends to produce; "Maria said you cut her off twice in Tuesday's retro" is what you actually need to read. Second, AI runtime costs would push the price up substantially, and we'd rather hold the line at $99/year. The synthesis we do is statistical — averages, distributions, heatmaps, side-by-side comparisons — not narrative.

$99 per year, one plan, one user. That's the whole pricing page. Plus VAT or sales tax at checkout where applicable.

No. Same price for everyone, every year. Instead of a free trial, the demo runs the full product on sample data — no signup, no payment, no time limit — so you can try the whole thing before deciding. Combined with the 30-day money-back guarantee, the actual financial risk of buying is essentially zero.

No team plan, no per-seat pricing, no volume discount. Mirorly is single-user by design — one account per person, one $99/year subscription, owned by the person using it. If five people on your team want to use it, that's five separate $99 subscriptions, each in their own name. Your employer can absolutely reimburse the $99 (many do) and the receipt is invoiceable to a company; the account itself stays yours, and so does the data. The reason we don't sell seats: every time we've seen feedback tools wired into team rollouts, the development conversation gets contaminated by org politics. We'd rather keep this your loop.

$99 is the net price. Local taxes are added at checkout based on your jurisdiction, handled by LemonSqueezy as our merchant of record. Customers in the EU, US, UK, AU, and most other jurisdictions will see local tax added at the final step of checkout.

Full refund within 30 days, no questions asked — except for a five-minute exit survey we ask you to fill in. To start one: sign in to your dashboard → Cancel subscription, or email support@mirorly.com if you can't access your account. The survey is a learning conversation, not a justification — what worked, what didn't, what would have helped. After the survey, the money clears in 2–3 business days. We don't argue with the refund, don't try to "save" the customer with discounts, and don't charge a restocking fee. The five minutes are the only ask.

Maybe, eventually. Prices generally do over time. If we ever raise it, the pricing page will say so clearly — and we'll communicate the change well before it takes effect.

Whatever LemonSqueezy supports at checkout — major credit and debit cards, PayPal, and regional methods depending on your jurisdiction.

On Supabase (PostgreSQL), with regions chosen appropriate to your jurisdiction. The full processor list, regional details, and security specifics will be in the privacy policy when the product opens. The principle: your data is yours. We don't sell it, share it, or use it to train models.

No. Mirorly is your account, paid for by you, with no organization-side dashboard or HR-level visibility. Your employer doesn't have access to your data unless you choose to share specific results manually — for example, taking a screenshot to send to your boss after a round.

We'll publish the exact retention window in the privacy policy at product open. The principle: your account stays accessible to you for a reasonable read-only period after cancellation, so you can revisit historical rounds, and after that the data is deleted. Reactivating during the read-only window restores everything.

In the unlikely event Mirorly closes: a minimum of 30 days direct notice from the founder, a prorated refund for the unused portion of your annual subscription, and a one-time data export so you can take your responses with you. This is the one scenario where we commit to providing an export.

Not in the first version. If you need to share specific results outside Mirorly, screenshots work. We chose not to build export early because keeping the loop inside the product is part of how the comparison-over-time piece works. (The shutdown export described above is the exception, and only triggered if Mirorly itself closes.)

No. The link you send works regardless of how you identify yourself in the round. If you'd rather send a 360 round under just a first name — or a different display name in some contexts — that works.

Use the contact form linked in the footer, or email support@mirorly.com directly. For refund or account questions specifically, the exit survey at refund time is its own channel — you don't need to reach out separately first.